Lambert & Thiery (1921, p. 40) and Mortensen (1948, p. 141, 143) consider Pygopistes as a synonym of Pygorhynchus. However, Kier (1962, p. 86) believes the two genera to be quite distinct. He points out that Pygopistes has a much more inflated test, with steeper sides, a more rounded marginal outline, a more pulvinate adoral surface, the apical system being more eccentric anteriorly, while the phyllodes have fewer pore-pairs.
Pygopistes differs from Pygaulus in having a more inflated test and a more anteriorly eccentric apical system.
P. M. Kier. 1962. Revision of the cassiduloid echinoids. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 144 (3) 262 pp.
J. Lambert & P. Thiery. 1909-1925. Essai de nomenclature raisonnee des echinides. Libraire Septime Ferriere, Chaumont, 607 pp., 15 pls.
Pomel, A. 1883. Classification méthodique et Genera des Échinides vivante et fossiles. Thèses présentées a la Faculté des Sciences de Paris pour obtenir le Grade de Docteur ès Sciences Naturelles 503, Aldolphe Jourdan, Alger, 131 pp.
T. Mortensen. 1948. A monograph of the Echinoidea: 4 (1): Holectypoida, Cassiduloida. Reitzel, Copenhagen, 363 pp., 14 pls.