The Echinoid Directory

Eotiaris Lambert, 1899 , p. 82

Diagnostic Features
  • Known only from test fragments.
  • Test very small; interambulacral plates more or less firmly sutured but with imbricate ambulacral/interambulacral suture.
  • Interambulacral plates wide with confluent subcircular areoles on ambital and adoral surfaces, and just separated on adapical plates.
  • Primary tubercle dominates each plate, with perforate mamelon and crenulate platform (clearly seen on MCZ 101896). Scrobicular tubercles confined to adradial and interradial margins with single arc of extrascrobicular tuberculation; scrobicular tubercles undifferentiated.
  • Ambulacral zones sinuous; plating unknown.
  • Primary spines found along side test fragments: short, cylindrical without cortex but with distally pointing thorns scattered along shaft.
Distribution
Permian, Germany and UK.
Name gender feminine
Type
Cidaris keyserlingi Geinitz, 1843, p. 16, by original designation.
Species Included
  • E. keyserlingi (Geinitz, 1843); Lower Permian, Germany. E. verneuiliana (King, 1850); Kazanian, Upper Permian, England, may be synonymous.
  • ?E. connorsi Kier, 1965; Upper Permian, Texas, USA.
Classification and/or Status

Cidaroida; stem group (miocidarids).

Remarks

Unfortunately, this taxon remains too poorly known to be classified at any level other than Cidaroida. Lambert & Thiery (1910, p. 127) described the tubercles as imperforate, but they are clearly perforate in Lambert\'s material. The spines are similar in form to those of \'Miocidaris\' verneuiliana, which is therefore provisionally included here. Smith & Hollingworth (1990), following Bather (1909) synonymized E. keyserlingi (Geinitz) and E. verneuiliana (King), because poor knowledge of the former precluded their definitive differentiation.

\'Miocidaris\' connorsi Kier, 1965, from the Permian of the USA has interambulacral plates that are not obviously imbricate and may belong here. It differs in having very sparsely tuberculate interradial zones, and more elongate spines.

Lambert & Thiery, 1910, p. 128 included one other species when erecting this genus, but this is Triadotiaris grandaevus a very different form.

The material illustrated here is the only specimen of this species in the Lambert collection, and presumably was what he based this genus on.

Lambert, J. 1899. Revue critique de Paleozoologie 3, p. 82.

Lambert, J. 1900. Etude sur quelques echinides de l'Infra-Lias et du Lias. Bulletin de la Societe des Sciences historiques et naturelles de l\'Yonne 52 [for 1899], 3-57.

Lambert, J. & Thiery, P. 1909-1925. Essai de nomenclature raisonnee des echinides. Chaumont, Ferriere.