The NaturePlus Forums will be offline from mid August 2018. The content has been saved and it will always be possible to see and refer to archived posts, but not to post new items. This decision has been made in light of technical problems with the forum, which cannot be fixed or upgraded.
We'd like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has contributed to the very great success of the forums and to the community spirit there. We plan to create new community features and services in the future so please watch this space for developments in this area. In the meantime if you have any questions then please email:
Fossil enquiries: esid@nhm.ac.uk
Life Sciences & Mineralogy enquiries: bug@nhm.ac.uk
Commercial enquiries: ias1@nhm.ac.uk
This is a fossil oyster - maybe from the Upper Jurassic Oxford Clay - possibly Gryphaea dilatata
If so, then about 160 million years old.
If you can give the exact location I can post the relevant geology map.
Hello Dr T
Sorry for delay the fossil was found just North of the M4 and just West of the A34 literally a couple or so miles past and to the left of where the two roads cross eachother.
The area is covered in aggregate extraction points many of which are now freshwater fishing lakes.
Apparently these mineral deposits were laid down during the last Ice age and the river Thames at that location, was eight miles wide. How true that is much your territory. Thank you for your time :)
If you mean near Chieveley (from which I am sending this) then your fossil is not in place. All the rocks in this area are Upper Cretaceous Chalk or superficial deposits derived from it. There are no extraction points so I think you have the wrong location info. Please try again and mark it on a snip of a Google map - thanks
Your right, thinking back, I came off at the Wantage road, think it was East Isley area fairly close to the A34
If was was excavated in situ from bedrock then it must have come fom the Oxford Clay (OC on the map). Otherwise it had been dumped by man or transported by rivers during and after the Ice Ages.. Was it a deep excavation with dark grey sticky clay or was it gravel?
Lft Clk to enlarge
Bedrock Geology Map:-
Superficial Deposits:-
Most of the gravel extraction was in the Theale-Reading area and the Staines-Heathrow area further south and east
The area we were digging had been stripped of overburden there was a layer of graded gravel about 3m deep and then dark grey clay. There was a pump sump dug in 1corner of the cut and the fossil was in the spoil from the sump pit. There also seemed to be huge snail like shapes in the pile but they just fell apart and seemed to be made entirely of clay. Hope this is helpful. The excavated gravel went via a conveyor straight into a concrete batching plant on the site.
So was the fossil in a gravel from the sump or in clay from the sump?
My reading of this is from the grey (Oxford) clay, so Gryphaea is certain and probably dilatata. Sorry - just seen this post!
In the clay Dr T, the gravel had been removed.
I can't remember the exact location of the site unfortunately. I was there for 1week but I did the following week at a site further South. For that job, I came off the A34 North just past the Tot Hill services and turned right. Now thinking it may have been there. I found a piece of naturally formed iron ore at the first site, and may have found the fossil at the other! Thanks everyone for your patience and thank you for the geology maps Dr T
That would take you to the gravel pits east of Newbury (River Kennet) but the rocks are much younger. I think you have to go with the answers to your two questions:-
1) Is this a fossil? Answer = Yes
2) (or) is it a preserved oyster shell? Answer is No, not a historic oyster shell (not archaeology)
It is a fossil oyster shell about 160 million years old.
It has at least one baby oyster and one serpulid worm attached:-
I apreciate your help Dr T sorry i couldnt be more specific about the location. Very interesting about the baby oyster and worm though.
Please mark this as Answered - thx