Darwin’s finches don’t tell the whole story of avian evolution
A new study by Museum and UCL researchers has found that on a global scale, shared ancestry and behaviour are more important factors than diet
The connection between bird diet and skull shape is surprisingly weak for most species according to a new study led by the Museum and University College London, rewriting our understanding of how ecosystems influence evolution.
Charles Darwin’s 19th century observations of finches on the Galápagos Islands concluded that bird speciation was primarily influenced by ecosystem; the way a bird forages and eats forms its skull shape and drives evolutionary change.
However, a new study by Museum and UCL researchers testing a wider range of species than ever before has found that on a global scale, shared ancestry and behaviour are more important factors than diet. The study, published in Royal Society journal Proceedings B, tested the skull shape of 352 bird species, representing 159 out of the 195 existing families, making it the largest study of its kind.
‘If we apply Darwin’s conclusion for different kinds of birds who primarily eat fish, pelicans and penguins should have exactly the same head and beak shape, as they both use their beaks to eat fish. However, pelicans have a long beak and large throat pouch, while penguins’ beaks are comparatively small,’ explained Dr Ryan Felice, former postdoctoral researcher at the Museum and UCL lead on this study. ‘Although they eat the same, pelicans and penguins acquire their prey in different ways, demonstrating the important role behaviour plays in cranial evolution.’
Penguins' mouths have a series of spines pointing down their throats, so that food stays is locked in when caught. Pelicans ingeniously catch fish in their pouch and then tip it back to drain out the water and swallow the fish immediately.
‘It is evolutionary history, rather than diet, that has most significantly influenced cranial shape. If you are descended from a duck-like ancestor, you will probably have a duck bill, no matter what diet you have. However, shared diet establishes the parameters of skull evolution, determining the range of potential shapes which can evolve.’
‘Our study focused on the skull, but we hypothesise that other parts of the body could be shaped by diet and ecology, such as wings, talons, and stomachs, as these are the parts of their bodies which are crucial for catching and digesting prey,’ said Professor Anjali Goswami, Research Leader at the Museum and co-author on the study.
The researchers also discovered that birds who eat grains – such as finches and quail – and those who survive on the nectar of flowers – like hummingbirds – exhibit the highest rate of cranial evolution. By contrast, terrestrial carnivores – hawks, falcons, owls and other birds who hunt and eat using their talons – exhibit a very slow rate of cranial change.
‘This is where natural selection comes into play,’ continued Professor Goswami. ‘Birds that eat nectar or seeds are going to experience lots of competition for resources and must evolve in order to survive.’
The study used state-of-the-art equipment to build high resolution 3D digital models of the bird skulls. This allowed researchers to plot many more points on the skull than previously possible, allowing them to make robust and accurate measurements.
‘Our next step is to expand this analysis to other groups of animals, like mammals, reptiles, and dinosaurs,’ said Dr. Felice. ‘Our goal is to understand all of the different factors that have shaped skull evolution through time.’
This study was funded by the European Research Council, the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and SYNTHESIS.
Notes to editors
For more information or to speak to those involved, please contact: Tash Payne, UCL Media Relations. T: +44 (0)20 3108 9243, E: email@example.com
Ryan N. Felice, Joseph A. Tobias, Alex L. Pigot and Anjali Goswami, ‘Dietary niche and the evolution of cranial morphology in birds’ will be published in Proceedings B on Wednesday 20 February 2018, 00.01 UK time and is under a strict embargo until this time.
The DOI for this paper will be http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2677.
· The Natural History Museum exists to inspire a love of the natural world and unlock answers to the big issues facing humanity and the planet. It is a world-leading science research centre, and through its unique collection and unrivalled expertise it is tackling issues such as food security, eradicating diseases and managing resource scarcity. The Natural History Museum is the most visited natural history museum in Europe and the top science attraction in the UK; we welcome around five million visitors each year and our website receives over 500,000 unique visitors a month. People come from around the world to enjoy our galleries and events and engage both in-person and online with our science and educational activities through innovative programmes and citizen science projects.
· UCL was founded in 1826. We were the first English university established after Oxford and Cambridge, the first to open up university education to those previously excluded from it, and the first to provide systematic teaching of law, architecture and medicine. We are among the world's top universities, as reflected by performance in a range of international rankings and tables. UCL currently has over 41,500 students from 150 countries and over 12,500 staff. www.ucl.ac.uk | Follow us on Twitter @uclnews | Watch our YouTube channel YouTube.com/UCLTV