|
Aprostocetus
szöcsi (Erdos)
|
 |
|
|
|
-
|
|
Graham, M.W.R. de V. (1961),
The genus Aprostocetus Westwood sensu lato (Hym., Eulophidae) notes on the synonymy of European species.
Entomologist's Monthly Magazine
97
pp. 34-64
| |
|
|
New combination for
Geniocerus szöcsi Erdos
(page 47)
|
|
|
|
|
Baryscapus
szoecsi (Erdos)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Graham, M.W.R. de V. (1991),
A reclassification of the European Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae): revision of the remaining genera.
Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute
No 49
pp. 322pp
| |
|
|
New combination based on incorrect emendation of
Geniocerus szöcsi Erdos
(page 112)
|
|
|
|
|
Eutetrastichus
scoecsi (Erdos)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Storozheva, N.A.; Kostjukov, V.V.; Efremova, Z.A. (1995),
46. Family Eulophidae.
Keys to Insects of the Russian Far East
IV(2)
pp. 291-505
(Ed: Lera, P.A.)
Dal'nauka, Vladivostok
| |
|
|
Misspelling of species group name
Eutetrastichus szocsi (Erdös)
(page 439)
|
|
|
|
|
Geniocerus
szöcsi Erdos
|
|
|
Erdös, J. 1958, Eulophidae in Hungaria recenter detectae. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
3:221
[ According to the ICZN (1985) Article 32(d)(2) the spelling of the species epithet is invalid and must be corrected by dropping the umlaut. ]
| |
| |
|
|
New species,
figs.,
Lectotype
 ,
HNHM,
Hungary,
designated by Thuróczy, C. (1992), The types of Chalcidoidea described by Hungarian authors, preserved in the Hungarian Natural History Museum. Folia Entomologica Hungarica
52:169
|
|
|
Tetrastichus
szocsi (Erdos)
|
|
|
|
- |
Herting, B. (1975), Lepidoptera, Part 1 (Microlepidoptera). A catalogue of parasites and predators of terrestrial arthropods. Section A. Host or Prey/Enemy.
6:31
(Earliest use of name recorded in this database)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Tetrastichus
szoecsi (Erdos)
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Domenichini, G. (1966),
I Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera Eulophidae) palearctici ed i loro ospiti.
Bollettino di Zoologia agraria e di Bachicoltura (II)
6
pp. 61-205
| |
|
New combination, incorrect justified emendation of
Geniocerus szöcsi Erdos
(page 118)
[ Emendation is justified but incorrect since according to Article 32(d)(2) a non-German umlaut is to be emended only by its deletion and not the addition of the letter "e". ]
|
|
|
|
