Universal Chalcidoidea Database

Associates of named chalcidoid

Associates of Parachrysocharis anomalococci

Records 1 - 6 of 6
Search again
Primary hosts
Order: Hemiptera
Family: Asterolecaniidae
Anomalococcus crematogastri
     
Husain, T.; Khan, M.Y. 1986, Family Eulophidae. (In: Subba Rao, B.R.; Hayat, M. (Eds) - The Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) of India and the adjacent countries.) Oriental Insects 20:236     view Husain, T.; Khan, M.Y.  (1986) in PDF format
     
Khan, M.Y.; Shafee, S.A. 1980, Taxonomic studies on some Indian eulophid parasites (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 76(2):332-334    
Family: Fulgoridae
Fulgoridae unspecified sp.
     
Narendran, T.C. 2007, Indian chalcidoid parasitoids of the Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No 272:180 Zoological Survey of India, Kolkatha (Record incorrect, see "Notes") [ This record is obviously incorrect since the original reference referred to for this record does not mention a fulgorid as a host. ]    
Family: Lophopidae
Pyrilla sp.
     
Narendran, T.C. 2007, Indian chalcidoid parasitoids of the Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No 272:180 Zoological Survey of India, Kolkatha (Record incorrect, see "Notes") [ This record is obviously incorrect since the original reference referred to for this record does not mention Pyrilla as a host. ]    
Plant associates
Order: not specified
Family: Fabaceae
Acacia sp.
     
Khan, M.Y.; Shafee, S.A. 1980, Taxonomic studies on some Indian eulophid parasites (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 76(2):332-334    
Family: Moraceae
Ficus sp.
     
Narendran, T.C. 2007, Indian chalcidoid parasitoids of the Tetrastichinae (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Records of the Zoological Survey of India, Occasional Paper No 272:180 Zoological Survey of India, Kolkatha (Record incorrect, see "Notes") [ This record is obviously incorrect since the original reference referred to for this record does not mention Ficus as a plant associate. ]