Nye & Fletcher (1991) stated:-
The citation by Duponchel is available as a type-species designation as it is contained in the continuation of a layout in which Duponchel stated, in the same work 7(2): 102, that the species so cited were the type of genera.
Unavailable designation of type-species T. aemulella was designated by Boisduval, 1836, Hist. nat. Insectes (Spec. gén. Lépid.) 1: 149. In the Introduction to the volume, pages 1-154, Boisduval reviewed earlier classifications of Lepidoptera and designated up to three different type-species for each generic name. In his "Exposé de notre Méthode", pages 155-690, no type-species designation was made for any of the genera he himself used. Under the Code (Edn 3), Article 69(a)(iv), the type-species designation of an author is eligible for consideration if he states that it is the type".. and if it is clear that the author accepts it as the type-species". Boisdival's type designation, although clearly stated, do not fufill the last requirement and so are unavailable. Even though Boisduval's 1836 work was well known to lepidopterists, the type-designation contained in a have not been accepted by Hemming or by other authors.
Invalid designation of type-species: Alucita sulphurella Fabricius, 1775, was designated by Fletcher, 1929, Mem. Dep. Agric. India (Ent.) 11: 64, and has been accepted as the type-species by some authors.
Dasycera was established as an objective replacement name for Dasycerus Haworth, 1828, a junior homonym.
See also: Gnaphalodeocera Agassiz, 1847; Gnaphalodocera Blanchard, 1840.
Learn more about Oecophoridae in Wikipedia
Search the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL) for references to DASYCERA and included species.