References Darwin's after notes about Darwin/Wallace publication on evolution by natural selection.
A typical letter handwritten by author in English and signed by author.
An original MS
Total Pages : 2
Pages with text: 2
Transcriber: Nguyen, Vincent Duong-Vi
Transcription date: September 4, 2014
Scrutiny: 04/09/2014 - Benny, Ruth;
Signed off: no
My dear Darwin
You lucubrations have all gone to Press. Busk1, Henslow2 Huxley3 & I all thought that two of your after notes should go to footnotes--1 That your work was not written with care or for publication. --& 2d the capital illustration regarding cotton seeds fibre.4
I warned you that my tabulation of Bentham was very hasty & inaccurate. I introduced discrepancies by 1. Sometimes not always introducing as varieties well known species of Babington quoted as synonyms by Bentham yet somehow not alluded to as vars [] 2. Generally by accident but not invariably enumerating as a variety the species itself as well as Benthams 1, 2, 3 &c.
All these errors tend to favor me & their elimination would I doubt not favor you --I was anxious to put the matter as favorably as I conscientiously could to my views, that the evidence might be overwhelming if the result was still against me. --
Most of the discrepancies are probably careless ones.
I have had several talks with Busk about you.
1. Busk, George (1807 – 1886). A English surgeon for the Royal Navy and comparative anatomist.
2. Henslow, John Stevens (1796 – 1861). An English clergyman, botanist, and geologist.
3. Huxley, Thomas Henry (1825 – 1895). An English biologist and comparative anatomist.
4. Hooker refers to the Darwin-Wallace paper presented to the Linnean Society in 1858.
Please note that work on this transcript is not yet complete. Users are advised to study electronic image(s) of this document, if available.