Sent by Alfred Russel Wallace, [Corfe View, Parkstone, Dorset] to Richard Theodore Ely John Hopkins University, Baltimore on .
No summary available at this time.
Anon. (1891). An English naturalist. Alfred Russell [sic] Wallace converted by Bellamy's book. New York Times,(12303): 9. [p. 9]
Transcriber: Smith, Charles Hyde
Transcription date: March 4, 2013
Scrutiny: 04/03/2013 - Catchpole, Caroline;
Signed off: no
[]1 [p. 9]
Baltimore, Jan. 31.--Mr. Alfred Russell Wallace, the distinguished English naturalist, in a letter recently written to Prof. R. F. Ely of Johns Hopkins University, called forth by reading the latter's "Political Economy," said:
"I am much pleased with it, especially with your fair and sympathetic treatment of Socialism. Some of your illustrations of the weakness of Socialism would have satisfied me a year ago, but it seems to me they are all well answered in Bellamy's 'Looking Backward.'
"From boyhood, when I was an ardent admirer of Robert Owen, I have been interested in Socialism, but reluctantly came to the conclusion that it was impracticable, and also, to some extent, repugnant to my ideas of individual liberty and home privacy. But Mr. Bellamy has completely altered my views in this matter. He seems to me to have shown that real, not merely delusive, liberty, together with full scope for individualism and complete human privacy, is compatible with the most thorough Socialism, and henceforth I am heart and soul with him.
"It is, however, a long way to such a goal, and your book will, I think, help men to a knowledge of the evils that have immediately to be remedied. I cannot see how the greatest evils of our present system, involuntary idleness and consequent pauperism, can ever be got rid of under the system of unrestricted competition and capitalism with labor as a marketable commodity."
Mr. Wallace, in a subsequent letter giving permission to use the foregoing letter, added:
"I should like to add that I do not think the course of social reform can be the same in England as in America. Our territorial aristocracy, still retaining much of the power they possessed in feudal times, are the source of the profound class distinctions that still prevail among us, and must be got rid of before we can make any real progress. Our first step, therefore, must be the nationalization of the land, by which the power and prestige of the great landlords will be destroyed. The workers, having free access to the land, will then be able to accumulate capital and to establish co-operative industries among themselves. They will thenceforth be independent of both landlords and capitalists, and the step will not be a difficult one from the partial and local to complete and national co-operation."
1. Editor Charles H. Smith's Note: A letter to Raphael Meldola read at the 27 October 1883 meeting of the Essex Field Club, and later printed on page lx of Volume Four of their Journal of Proceedings series in 1892.
SOURCE OF TRANSCRIPT
Please note that work on this transcript is not yet complete. Users are advised to study electronic image(s) of this document, if available.