PK {< refs.MYD ? + Cameron, S. A.
Hines, H. M.
Williams, P. H. 20075 A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus) 161-188) Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 91 Bumble bees (Bombus Latreille) occupy a wide diversity of habitats, from alpine meadows to lowland tropical forest, yet they appear similar in morphology throughout their range, suggesting that behavioral adaptations play a more important role in colonizing diverse habitats. Notwithstanding their structural homogeneity, bumble bees exhibit striking inter- and intraspecific variation in color pattern, purportedly the outcome of mimetic evolution. A robust phylogeny of Bombus would provide the framework for elucidating the history of their wide biogeographic distribution and the evolution of behavioral and morphological adaptations, including color pattern. However, morphological studies of bumble bees have discovered too few phylogenetically informative characters to reconstruct a robust phylogeny. Using DNA sequence data we report the first nearly complete species phylogeny of bumble bees, including most of the 250 known species from the 38 currently recognized subgenera. Bayesian analysis of nuclear (opsin, EF-1a, arginine kinase, PEPCK) and mitochondrial (16S) sequences results in a highly resolved and strongly supported phylogeny from base to tips, with clear-cut support for monophyly of most of the conventional morphology-based subgenera. Most subgenera fall into two distinct clades (short-faced and long-faced) associated broadly with differences in head morphology. Within the short-faced clade is a diverse New World clade, which includes nearly one-quarter of the currently recognized subgenera, many of which are restricted to higher elevations of Central and South America. The comprehensive phylogeny provides a firm foundation for reclassification and evaluating character evolution in the bumble bees.$ doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00784.x ? + Hines, H. M.
Cameron, S. A.
Williams, P. H. 2006 Molecular phylogeny of the bumble bee subgenus Pyrobombus (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) with insights into gene utility for lower-level analysis 289-303 Invertebrate Systematics 20 Species of the largest bumble bee subgenus, Pyrobombus, possess too few known morphological synapomorphies to reveal a clear pattern of their relationships. To obtain a robust phylogeny of the group, we use sequence data from four genes (mitochondrial 16S rRNA, and three nuclear genes: elongation factor-1 alpha (EF-1a), long wavelength rhodopsin (LW Rh or opsin), and arginine kinase (ArgK)) for 36 of the 43 Pyrobombus species. The resulting phylogeny is well resolved and indicates a monophyletic Pyrobombus when assessed against representatives of 20 additional subgenera. The sister group to Pyrobombus comprises the Alpinobombus+Bombus sensu stricto clade. We also assess the utility of these genes for resolving species-level relationships. The more conserved nuclear genes, especially EF-1a and ArgK, performed better than 16S in nearly all measures of gene utility, with 16S providing resolution mostly at the tips of the tree. The exon regions of ArgK were the most conserved and may be promising for higher-level phylogenetics. We discuss species relationships relative to previous taxonomic studies and their implications for commercial rearing of Bombus. *? Goulson, D.
Williams, P. 2001? Bombus hypnorum (Hymenoptera: Apidae), a new British bumblebee? 129-1311 British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 14 A male of the bumblebee Bombus hypnorum (Linnaeus) has been collected in Wiltshire. This species has not been recorded previously from Britain and its identification and status are discussed. ? j Williams, P. H. 1982B The distribution and decline of British bumble bees (Bombus Latr.) 236-245 Journal of Apicultural Research 21 The suggested recent decrease in the distributional ranges of certain species of bumble bees was investigated in the data collected by the Bumblebee Distribution Maps Scheme, using a numerical classificatory approach. Three major biogeographic elements and four biogeographic regions are defined, and changes in their composition and distribution described. Large reductions in the distributional ranges recorded after 1960 were found for two of the biogeographic elements (especially for the Southern Local Species: Bombus subterraneus (L.), B. sylvarum (L.), B. ruderatus (F.) and B. humilis (Ill.), which have resulted in the emergence of a new Central Impoverished Region covering 23 vice-counties in Central England.'? = Williams, P. H. 1985b A preliminary cladistic investigation of relationships among the bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) 239- 255 Systematic Entomology 10 b/ The cladistic method is used to classify sixty species of bumble bees by characters of the male genitalia selected for their functional importance. A system of three genera is recommended, preserving the holophyletic groups Mendacibombus Skorikov, Psithyrus Lepeletier and Bombus Latreille, with the retention of the named subgroups of Bombus in subgeneric status. A new subgenus Brachycephalibombus is recognized in order to avoid paraphyletic groupings. The phylogenetic interpretation of the cladogram is considered and biogeographic problems discussed. ? Williams, P. H. 1985t On the distribution of bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) with particular regard to patterns within the British Isles 180 Department of Applied Biology Cambridge University of Cambridge Ph. D.
If ecology can be considered as the study of the distribution and abundance of organisms, then the mechanisms governing the distributions of bumble bees are not only of practical importance to pollination and conservation interests, but also of primary theoretical concern. In this dissertation the distributions of bumble bees are examined at successively finer scales and patterns described from analyses of surveys.
The cladistic method is used to classify sixty species by characters of the male genitalia selected for their functional significance. The phylogenetic interpretation of the composite character state tree is considered in conjunction with present patterns in distribution between continents for the evaluation of possible histories of spread and speciation.
Regional patterns of distribution within England, Wales and Scotland in the Bumblebee Distribution Maps Scheme data are described using a classificatory approach. Three major biogeogarphic elements and four biogeographic regions are defined. Large reductions in the distributional ranges recorded after 1960 are found for two of the elements, which have resulted in the emergence of a new Central Impoverished Region encompassing twenty-three vice-counties in central England.
Local patterns of distribution are described from Kent within the Southern Region, the sole region wherein all three elements retain a strong representation after 1960. Those species that occur only in particular regions of Britain after 1960 are also very locally restricted within this region and less abundant where present. They are further associated with certain open habitats, characterised by coastal and old meadow vegetation. This may be indicative of a relative lack of disturbance. A general mechanism is proposed, founded here on considerations of the economics of energy, to explain a species' pattern of distribution, in which fragmentation at the margins of the distribution occurs in response to a mosaic of effectively only two types of habitat presenting differing fundamental levels of limiting resources.
Coexistence is examined within a small area of Dungeness in Kent, where there is a particularly large assemblage of species. Flower choice by worker bumble bees and partitioning of nectar resources is compared with that at Shoreham, which is a more typical, species-poor site in north Kent. The possible causes and effects of differences in the flora utilised by bumble bees are discussed. The marginal mosaic model is used to predict an alternative form of resource-dependent 'structure' in local species assemblages that is amenable to testing.
Finally, the apparent decline of the British bumble bees nearer the edges of their distributions is discussed with regard to factors including climate and changes in land use.&