|
THE
INGENIOUS MR. FAIRCHILD: THE FORGOTTEN FATHER OF THE FLOWER GARDEN
by MICHAEL LEAPMAN.
HEADLINE
BOOK PUBLISHING, LONDON. 2000. 280 pp.
|
It
is not often that a specimen from the Sloane Herbarium features
as the image on the dust jacket of a popular book! But there
is "Fairchild's mule", the hybrid of a sweet william (Dianthus
barbatus L.) and a gillyflower (Dianthus
caryophyllus L.), linen tapes and all - on the cover
of this entertaining book about Thomas Fairchild, gardener
extraordinaire in London in the late seventeenth century.
The book is a history of gardening in early London, and
in a way, a history of London itself. Fairchild's genius
is set clearly in this context, and Leapman imaginatively
and cleverly documents the way in which gardening and an
appreciation of plants was popularized. I think Leapman
does not really give men such as Sir Hans Sloane their due
however - it is, after all, only because Sloane had a specimen
of "Fairchild's mule" that we know it existed at all and
can pin down the time of its creation. Herbaria are the
lasting documentation of history, and as such, are resources
to be valued.
|
 |
The
book ends with a discussion of the GM debate - which I have reviewed
elsewhere (Knapp, 2000). Leapman quite rightly points out that
although deeply religious and believers in God's design, Fairchild
and his contemporaries were in no way sentimental about nature
and her products. Thomas Fairchild would not have stopped to wonder
whether or not we needed a blue rose, he probably would have set
out to try to make one.
Knapp, S. 2000. Sex, leaves and rock and roll. Review of "The
ingenious Mr. Fairchild: forgotten father of the flower garden".
Nature 405: 885-886.
Sandra
Knapp
A
MONK AND TWO PEAS:THE STORY OF GREGOR MENDEL AND THE DISCOVERY
OF GENETICS by ROBIN MARANTZ HENIG.
WEIDENFELD
AND NICOLSON, LONDON.
2000. 278 pp.
Every
biologist (and every schoolchild for that matter) has been taught
the story of Gregor Mendel - Austrian monk who bred peas and discovered
the principles of inheritance by looking at flower and seed colour.
We also all know that his work lay undiscovered and unnoticed
until early in the 20th Century, and that if Charles Darwin had
known about Mendel's pea experiments, many of the mysteries of
how evolution by natural selection worked would have been solved
at a stroke. Well, this book is the story behind the story we
all know - a tale of patience, idiosyncracy, hard work and academic
jealousy.
 |
Gregor
Mendel was a lucky man - a peculiar and sickly child, he
found a comfortable niche in the monastery at Brnn, where
academic pursuits were encouraged and his "mania" for plant
breeding supported, both financially and physically. The
mid-19th Century was a time of great change in the sciences,
particularly in biology. Old ideas about the fixity of nature
were being questioned, and the interface between science
and religion was changing fast. Act One of Henig's drama
is the life and times of Mendel himself. Mendel worked on
peas for decades, crossing strains with particular characters
in combination and singly. His crossings were the logical
extension of Thomas Fairchild's hybridization experiments
- by the time Mendel was alive, the fact that plants had
sex like animals was well established. He sent his Pisum
L., paper to the famous botanist Carl von Ngeli, who suggested
that his results were weak and that he continue his experiments,
but using a different plant.
|
The plants von Ngeli suggested were hawkweeds in the genus Hieracium
L. - now well-known for their complex interplay of apomixis and
hybridization. What a terrible suggestion! Was it deliberate and
inspired by von Ngeli's jealousy? Mendel ruined his eyesight
working with Hieracium, and made no further progress. He
became disillusioned with his science and stopped corresponding
with his peers. However it does not all end in tragedy, Mendel
ended his days as the abbot of the monastery, collecting jokes
and being loved for his gentleness and good humour.
Most
of us don't get an Act Two to our lives - but Mendel did. Act
Two of Mendel's story also has at its centre controversy and professional
jealousy - this time between scientists working separately but
"rediscovering" Mendel's work at more or less the same time. William
Bateson and Raphael Weldon of Cambridge, Hugo de Vries of Amsterdam
and Thomas Hunt Morgan of Columbia University were all larger
than life characters - and Henig skillfully tells their interlocking
stories, rife with jealousy and controversy. The lives of men
were as interesting as their science, and the weaving together
of strands of high excitement and tragic loss which all of these
men experienced makes their science all that much more thrilling.
This is a book to inspire those not yet captivated by genetics
to take a closer look, and to show those who characterize genetics
as inherently evil another side of the coin. As with Leapman's
book, Henig concludes with a brief look at the genetic modification
debate - and reminds us all that there is no such thing as a harmless
putterer working quietly in a monastery garden, all of our actions
to increase knowledge have consequences, sometimes good, sometimes
bad. But to deny the pursuit of knowledge would be tragedy indeed
- worse even than Hieracium!
Sandra
Knapp
MEDIEVAL
HERBALS, THE ILLUSTRATIVE TRADITIONS by MINTA COLLINS
THE
BRITISH LIBRARY AND UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS, 2000. 334pp.
For
many people herbals are epitomised by the works of Gerard and Culpeper
but their history predates these gentlemen by a very long time.
This book deals with a group of herbal texts of the 14th and 15th
Centuries and the influence on them of even earlier Greek, Arabic
and Latin works. Carefully researched and clearly the result of
considerable labour, the book is concerned with the evolution of
art forms in Herbals. This is as it should be, since Minta Collins
is an art historian. On one hand this approach is slightly disappointing
for botanists, since the work concentrates on the role of art in
herbals and tells us little about the subjects of the illustrations
i.e. the plants themselves. On
the other, there is plentiful information about how these works
were put together, the influence of early authors on those who followed
and even on collection methods, such as the illustration of Balsamus
in the Tractatus de Herbis which shows a man hanging glass vials
on the tree to gather the sap. Perhaps the most intriguing insights
concern the uses to which herbals were put. They were not only used
as medical texts and pharmacopeae, but also as treatises on natural
philosophy, teaching aids and even as visual propaganda in their
authors' own support. On a more venal level, lavish examples were
given as gifts to impress the rich and influential.
This
book is definitely for the specialist but the illustrations which
accompany the text (a generous 30 colour plates and 80 black and
white ones) require no great depth of knowledge to be appreciated.
They show the full gamut of Herbal art, from crude and unidentifiable
images to accurate and beautifully depicted specimens which must,
surely, have been drawn from life. A number of these were new
to me and furnish excellent examples of their kind.
The
author rightly points out that at least some of the early herbals
were produced as scientific texts. They may have little to do
with modern plant systematics in a direct sense but nonetheless
form a part of the evolutionary history of the modern discipline
and it is both interesting and informative to examine the roots
of our subject. Dr Collins' belief that the change in our perceptions
of Herbal traditions wrought by recent publications has not yet
overtaken the overall view of Herbals is well-founded. However,
I found one comment by Dr Collins rather curious - that interest
in Herbals has increased in the last twenty years. Perhaps she
is speaking relatively, for surely there was great interest in
them before 1980!
Bob
Press
AN
INTRODUCTION TO CLOUD FOREST TREES: MONTEVERDE, COSTA RICA
by W. A. HABER, W. ZUCHOWSKI AND E. BELLO.
MOUNTAIN GEM PUBLICATIONS, 2000. 202 pp.
|
Monteverde
is probably the most widely visited cloud forest in the
tropics and is a good place to get people interested in
plants and botany. This guide is well written and researched
and the identification keys are easy to use and sensible
i.e. rely on features which you are likely to encounter
year round. From the illustrations and descriptions, it
is clear that this is the work of experienced field botanists.
Particularly good are the 'comments' sections which provide
a range of interesting natural history facts plus give an
idea as to what local uses exist for the plants. All in
all, this is probably the way to get non-botanists to look
at the trees and shrubs which surround them in a forest.
One small criticism is that this guide appears to exist
only in English, which is a shame in a Spanish-speaking
country.
|
 |
Alex
Monro
GEORGE
CLIFFORD HERBARIUM ON-LINE
 |
George
Clifford was an Anglo-Dutch financier with a large mansion
and garden, Hartekamp near Haarlem in the Nertherlands.
Linnaeus spent some time in the 1730's working in Clifford's
garden describing the new plants being cultivated there
and compiling his Hortus Cliffortianus (1738). As
in other similar works Linnaeus quoted the polynomials of
many other authors in synonymy in this work, which he then
used extensively when compiling his legendary Species
Plantarum (1753). Both the book and the associated specimens
thus have an extremely important bearing upon the typification
of Linnaean names many of which of course are still in use
today, including Triticum aestivum L. (breadwheat),
typified by a Clifford specimen.
|
All
of the specimens (nearly 3,500) have now been digitised and a
searchable database, including full type informationm, has also
been completed. This new addition to the Department's virtual
presence, which will be live early 2001, will complement those
already on-line (the John
Clayton Herbarium, Sir
Hans Sloane Jamaican Botanical Collections and The
Paul Hermann Herbarium).
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/botany/databases/clifford/index.html
WEB REVIEWS
|
The
Kew Record of Taxonomic Literature is produced by The
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew and has been published quarterly
by the Stationery Office since 1971. It has long been a
valuable source of references for botanists. However, so
far there are well over 100 indices to peruse if one wants
to find all literature cited for a given taxon. Now, to
everyone's great relief, the information has been databased
and is available as an online search facility.
|
 |
| The
Kew Record
of Taxonomic Literature database contains references to
all publications relating to the taxonomy of flowering plants,
gymnosperms and ferns. It also includes references on phytogeography,
nomenclature, chromosome surveys, chemotaxonomy, floras and
botanical institutions, along with articles of taxonomic interest
in the fields of anatomy and morphology, palynology, embryology
and reproductive biology, and relevant bibliographies and
biographies. There is no charge for using the database. Search
options are varied, including an advanced search facility,
enabling sorting, saving of information in database format
etc. This is a highly valuable site that saves considerable
time, the only drawback being that a maximum of 500 references
can be retrieved at one time. |
|